News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Adding a feature because ChatGPT incorrectly thinks it ex... by kragen on Monday July 07, 2025 @01:44PM (#44492812)
Sometimes it's used without thinking, and often the writing is made shorter and clearer when the passive voice is removed. But not always; rewriting my previous sentence to name the agents in each case, as the active voice requires in English, would not improve it. (You could remove "made", though.)
Re:Adding a feature because ChatGPT incorrectly thinks it ex... by Rayhem on Tuesday July 08, 2025 @11:10AM (#44500750)
> Sometimes authors use it without thinking, but removing the passive voice often makes writing shorter and clearer.

I don't think mentioning "authors" is absolutely necessary, but I think this is both a faithful attempt to convert this to natural active voice and easier to read/understand.

Re:Adding a feature because ChatGPT incorrectly thinks it ex... by kragen on Tuesday July 08, 2025 @09:09PM (#44505433)
I agree that it's a perfectly fine way to say it in the active voice, but I think it makes the sentence read slightly worse and require slightly more effort to understand. Certainly it's slightly longer. Possibly it depends on the reader; the passive voice seems to be more of an obstacle for Spanish-as-a-first-language speakers, for example, than for native English speakers.