Re:Show HN: Core – open source memory graph for LLMs – share...
by khaledh on Wednesday July 02, 2025 @12:24AM
(#44440246)
Not much tbh. I'm using markdown files as a memory bank[1] for my projects and it works well without the need to structure them in a schema/graph. But I guess one benefit of this particular memory graph implementation is its temporal aspect: searchable facts can evolve over time; i.e. what is true now and how it got here.
Re:Show HN: Core – open source memory graph for LLMs – share...
by cpard on Wednesday July 02, 2025 @02:02AM
(#44440653)
That’s interesting! I’ll take a deeper look. Thanks for sharing
Re:Show HN: Core – open source memory graph for LLMs – share...
by Manoj58 on Wednesday July 02, 2025 @02:32AM
(#44440787)
This is something we brainstorm a lot on. While LLMs can infer semantics at runtime, we got biased to explicit triples for these reasons:
Efficient, precise retrieval through graph traversal patterns that flat text simply can't match ("find all X related to Y through relationship Z")
Algorithmic contradiction detection by matching subject-predicate pairs across time, which LLMs struggle with across distant contexts
Our goal is also to make assistant more proactive, where triplets make pattern recognition more easy and effective
what do you think about these?
My question is, what’s the value of explicitly storing semantics as triples when the LLM can infer the semantics on runtime?