I don't know if misspelled on purpose, but I think the original name is a more accurate description than the typo (Discourse). Because it sure does create a lot of discord (disagreement and lack of harmony)
You might as well go to the Arch Linux forums or Stack Overflow. Where someone will berate you for bringing up an already discussed topic that is difficult to search for. And to rub salt into the wound, they almost never provide the cross-link...
Back on topic (kinda):
Man, I really do wish Signal would allow you to pin or bookmark messages. It sure beats the cluttered chaos of scrolling, searching, or forwarding to Notes To Self (which lacks a cross-link back but at least gives you precise search queries).
I actually sponsor Zulip because that's the world I want to live in: sane threading, public HTML views of the chats, Apache 2 licensed, and a "we host it for you" for Open Source communities
---
Back in the olden days, I actually would have submitted a PR to introduce that new behavior, but their "fuck you, it's our project" taught me that it's source available more than open source for any meaningful version of that
But thanks, I'll look into Zulip. Sounds like it has things I want
The signal forums that guy linked are from a Discourse instance/forum. Discourse is a platform to build forums.
Also, I don't know if Discourse was dropped in its head as a baby but only through some determined use of the mouse wheel could one possibly discover that there are ... I don't even know ... unlimited additional pages of discussion hiding in that thread. Infinite scroll wasn't designed to be taken literally, holy shit
At least with "Page 1 of 8675309" one can know in advance that they should pull up a chair. I guess the UX pattern is "hover over the '1h ago' URL to see the page number, n00b"
But, back on topic:
> We chose not to exclude all disappearing messages because
uh-huh, so kind of defeats the purpose of disappearing if they're preserved, eh?