News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Everyone Mark Zuckerberg Has Hired So Far for Meta's 'Sup... by hn_throwaway_99 on Monday June 30, 2025 @05:47PM (#44428262)
I sincerely doubt this understaffing of medical professionals is a technology problem, and I believe it much more likely to be an economic structural problem. And overall, I think that powerful generative AI will make these economic structural problems much worse.
Re:Everyone Mark Zuckerberg Has Hired So Far for Meta's 'Sup... by paxys on Monday June 30, 2025 @08:36PM (#44429428)
It's a gatekeeping problem. Doctors don't want more doctors because it dilutes their own value, so medical school and residency spots are kept artificially limited.
Re:Everyone Mark Zuckerberg Has Hired So Far for Meta's 'Sup... by HelloMcFly on Tuesday July 01, 2025 @08:45AM (#44433372)
This is oft-repeated truism, but what evidence do you have for this?

Here are some facts:

- Ultimately, the main chokepoint for the number of trained physicians is the number of residency spots. You can cut the price of med school to $0, you'll eventually end up with minimally more fully trained doctors because they need a residency spot.

- Residency spots are paid for by the federal government. Congress controls the number of available spots. Medical professional bodies do not determine this.

- The AMA has consistently asked members to support legislation increasing funding for GME positions (https://www.ama-assn.org/about/leadership/more-medicare-supp...). At one point (late 90s) they opposed expanding the slots, but this has not been true for some time. And, even if it were true, it's ultimately still not their call.