Re:Proton joins suit against Apple for predatory practices
by _benton on Monday June 30, 2025 @05:39PM
(#44428195)
That's not a valid analogy. There isn't a "requirement" that you only use vanilla Apple software on an iPhone. More accurate would be that the house is set up for ring cameras and the builder doesn't support implementing any other type of camera system.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Proton joins suit against Apple for predatory practices
by ghusto on Monday June 30, 2025 @06:05PM
(#44428408)
The house is set up for ring cameras and makes it either impossible or painful to use anything else. Not because of technical limitations, but in order to steer you away from competitors. Building something with it working in a particular way is fine, but building it in a particular way _in order_ for it not to work with competitors hurts everyone. I get the argument it's just because it makes their products work better, and call bullshit.
Re:Proton joins suit against Apple for predatory practices
by _benton on Monday June 30, 2025 @06:08PM
(#44428435)
Then why not buy one of the multitude of houses that exist with alternative and open camera systems, that are also cheaper and more ubiquitous?
Re:Proton joins suit against Apple for predatory practices
by ghusto on Wednesday July 02, 2025 @05:57PM
(#44449278)
In my case it's because I'm using another of their products (my Mac) that is _not_ locked down like the iDevices. My laptop doesn't lock me into my phone, but buying a phone that they have locked out of my laptop's special Apple-only APIs puts me at a disadvantage.