Re:Why 99% of Entrepreneurs Fail: Because they don't do any...
by thomasmallen on Wednesday January 21, 2009 @10:17PM
(#444283)
I think that the "ess" should only be added when sexual distinction is being communicated as well. Off the top of my head, I can only think of it coming up for very feminine nouns, such as "temptress" and "mistress." "Waitress" is still doable but discouraged.
Re:Why 99% of Entrepreneurs Fail: Because they don't do any...
by astrec on Wednesday January 21, 2009 @10:37PM
(#444307)
You're American then?
Waitress is still very much the term in this part of the world.
Re:Why 99% of Entrepreneurs Fail: Because they don't do any...
by sgk284 on Thursday January 22, 2009 @11:25AM
(#444959)
I'm american and this is the first I've heard of "waitress" being frowned upon here. My experience draws from Philadelphia, New York, and Silicon Valley (San Fran, Mountain View, and San Jose), but there are so many cultures in America I wouldn't be surprised if some places were moving away from the word.
Re:Why 99% of Entrepreneurs Fail: Because they don't do any...
by thomasmallen on Wednesday January 21, 2009 @11:31PM
(#444363)
Yep. See, we were overrun by the PC nuts in the 80s, but there are good parts. In the case of "waitress," I agree with them that the elaboration is unnecessary and pointless. So I value some PC when it delivers precision (but the arguments that certain speech is sexist seems far-fetched; "waitress" is not sexist).
Re:Why 99% of Entrepreneurs Fail: Because they don't do any...
by astrec on Thursday January 22, 2009 @12:14AM
(#444398)
A problem for the PC nuts, in particular those that maintain words like "waitress" are sexist, is that they're very often hastening the descent to a masculine-neutral, and so are ultimately complicit in preserving the very system they oppose.
It's probably quite baffling to someone for whom English is a secondary language.