News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Would HN be better if downvoting required justifi... by martin-t on Sunday June 29, 2025 @07:07PM (#44417455)
Votes influence where you comment appears and therefore how many people see it.

If there is systematic manipulation going on, we should look for ways to fight against it.

If people have incorrect opinions (yes, there is such a thing - e.g. an opinion that is based either on false information or on correct information and a faulty chain of reasoning), we should try to correct their mistake.

Re:Ask HN: Would HN be better if downvoting required justifi... by leakycap on Sunday June 29, 2025 @10:56PM (#44418816)
> If there is systematic manipulation going on, we should look for ways to fight against it.

I'd love to support this energy, but part of being serious is priorities

This energy needs to be put into something more meaningful than a chat site

> If people have incorrect opinions (yes, there is such a thing - e.g. an opinion that is based either on false information or on correct information and a faulty chain of reasoning), we should try to correct their mistake.

We? Speak for yourself, please. I'm only chatting to you because it seems you're focused on something meaningless: virtual points on the internet.

If you have something worth hearing, say it. People will listen if your message is important. Otherwise, patrolling the internet or worrying about post votes (just listen to what we're talking about!!) seems like a waste of our limited time breathing.

Re:Ask HN: Would HN be better if downvoting required justifi... by g-b-r on Thursday July 10, 2025 @07:30PM (#44526865)
> I'd love to support this energy, but part of being serious is priorities

This energy needs to be put into something more meaningful than a chat site

It's not a chat site, it's a discussion site, and some people get influenced by what they read.

Of course not a ton of people, but still, the discussions on it do have the chance of having some effect