Re:Libxml2's "no security embargoes" policy
by int_19h on Wednesday June 25, 2025 @11:10PM
(#44383882)
Great, then we have someone with both resources and an incentive to write and maintain an XML parser with strict availability guarantees.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Libxml2's "no security embargoes" policy
by fodkodrasz on Thursday June 26, 2025 @05:49AM
(#44385769)
Automotive companies pay big buck to vendors who supply certified tools/libraries, because getting stuff certified is lot of work/time. This also means that those stuff are often outdated, and a pain to work with, yet their vendors are not expected to function as charities, as often expected by FLOSS authors, esp. when releasing their code under BSD/MIT licenses and then getting eaten by the sharks.