News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Fun with uv and PEP 723. Parent comment

Re:Fun with uv and PEP 723 by indosauros on Tuesday June 24, 2025 @05:26PM (#44371242)
What's going on is "we have 14 standards so we need to create a 15th" actually worked this time
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Fun with uv and PEP 723 by kibwen on Tuesday June 24, 2025 @06:40PM (#44371810)
It works far more of the time than people give it credit for. There are a lot of good XKCDs, but that one is by far the worst one ever made, as far as being a damaging meme goes.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Fun with uv and PEP 723 by mturmon on Tuesday June 24, 2025 @07:43PM (#44372255)
"xkcd 927 Considered Harmful" ?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Fun with uv and PEP 723 by nickagliano on Tuesday June 24, 2025 @09:23PM (#44372832)
Fantastic comment
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Fun with uv and PEP 723 by hnfong on Wednesday June 25, 2025 @10:21AM (#44377661)
It's survival bias. You'd never see the confusion from would-have-failed standards-wannabes that xkcd927 helped prevent.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Fun with uv and PEP 723 by mmcnl on Wednesday June 25, 2025 @05:35AM (#44375310)
To be fair, I've used Poetry for years and it works/worked amazingly well. It's just not as fast as uv.
[ Parent | on HN ]