Re:A device with a touchscreen and few buttons was obvious
by confluence on Sunday August 26, 2012 @07:59PM
(#4436737)
Apple started it - Google is defending both Samsung and it's Android product from the litigiousness of the new Apple.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A device with a touchscreen and few buttons was obvious
by sbuk on Sunday August 26, 2012 @08:56PM
(#4436890)
No. Nokia and Motorola did. If you are going to pontificate, get your facts right.
Re:A device with a touchscreen and few buttons was obvious
by confluence on Sunday August 26, 2012 @09:06PM
(#4436919)
Go back far enough and someone's father started it - what's your point?
I didn't actively buy Nokia or Motorola for this very reason.
Google acquired Motorola to defend against Apple and Microsoft. They are doing so admirably.
Re:A device with a touchscreen and few buttons was obvious
by sbuk on Monday August 27, 2012 @03:04AM
(#4437754)
My point is that you are trying, constantly to have the final word in a construct of your making that is based entirely on a fallacy and doing so in an extremely smug manner. To follow your line of thought, with your hubris continuing to grow you will eventually become too cocky and get you next investment increadibly wrong and lose everything in the process.
Re:A device with a touchscreen and few buttons was obvious
by confluence on Monday August 27, 2012 @03:07AM
(#4437762)
I disagree with what you say unfortunately - so I guess we should just agree to disagree.
Re:A device with a touchscreen and few buttons was obvious
by mcclux on Monday August 27, 2012 @11:25AM
(#4439237)
Judging by the bump in AAPL today, I think you sold too soon.
Re:A device with a touchscreen and few buttons was obvious
by pazimzadeh on Monday August 27, 2012 @10:56AM
(#4439065)
Let's come back to this thread in a few months, shall we?