A device with a touchscreen and few buttons was obvious

Re:A device with a touchscreen and few buttons was obvious by taligent on Sunday August 26, 2012 @05:33PM (#4436300)

Well this comment is ridiculous.

If timing and marketing is all that matters for market success then Apple should NOT have been successful with iPod or iPad since they weren't the first MP3 player or tablet. And they definitely didn't have the experience of companies like Sony when it comes to marketing.

You criticize others about grasp on real history when you seem so quick to ignore it yourself.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A device with a touchscreen and few buttons was obvious by nitrogen on Sunday August 26, 2012 @06:59PM (#4436582)

The question isn't whether Apple was and is successful. The question is whether they deserve a ~two-decade monopoly on concepts that were incremental improvements on ideas developed by others. The parent comment in particular is meant to address a previous comment by nirvana that claimed "touch-oriented UI" was invented by Apple.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A device with a touchscreen and few buttons was obvious by corin_ on Sunday August 26, 2012 @05:45PM (#4436342)

I agree that it's about more than just timing and marketing, however I'd definitely suggest that Apple's marketing was superior to Sony's and played a big part in their success. Not the only part, but a big one.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A device with a touchscreen and few buttons was obvious by qu4z-2 on Monday August 27, 2012 @12:30AM (#4437443)

Timing may not be as simple as "first".

[ Parent | on HN ]