News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A device with a touchscreen and few buttons was obvious by lawdawg on Sunday August 26, 2012 @02:24PM (#4435766)
and people act like all Samsung did was copy. You realize they wouldn't be the most successful Android OEM if they didn't do their own innovation as well. And no, people aren't rushing out the buy Samsung phones because they look like iPhones (I mean they don't even have an Apple on the back, should be pretty obvious to anyone that it isn't an iPhone), they are buying them because they are cheaper and can do 90% of what an iPhone can do. Changing that to 88% (removing the two behavior patents) isn't going to make a dent in Samsungs ability to sell to the masses.
Re:A device with a touchscreen and few buttons was obvious by radley on Sunday August 26, 2012 @04:18PM (#4436091)
More like they can do 120% of what iOS can do. It's the UI mistakes that hurt them now. TouchWiz and S-Apps demonstrate innovation, but some of it is extremely disorganized (phone app) or painfully copied from iOS (S Voice).
Re:A device with a touchscreen and few buttons was obvious by lawdawg on Sunday August 26, 2012 @05:07PM (#4436220)
i was referring more to the Samsung phones that run 2.2 or 2.3. The ones that run 4.0 and 4.1 cost the exact same as the iPhone, so people who buy phones like the SG3 (and 6 months ago, the SG2) are doing so because they CHOSE Android, not because it looks like an iPhone.
Re:A device with a touchscreen and few buttons was obvious by radley on Sunday August 26, 2012 @08:04PM (#4436748)
Android 2.2 & 2.3 still had more features that iOS.

It was just ugly as hell.

Re:A device with a touchscreen and few buttons was obvious by catch23 on Sunday August 26, 2012 @06:45PM (#4436535)
Hm, I wouldn't be so sure... most "normal" people out there who don't read HN every day can't really tell the difference between an ipad and a galaxy tablet. My mom, for example, refers to both tablets as an ipad. She uses an ipad to read her news sites but when she tried to use my galaxy tab, she was confused there was no browser on there. I've experienced a similar thing on the train as well, people would point at my 10.1 tab and ask if that's the new ipad... tech people can sniff out brands from a mile away. You may laugh, but it's a different world out there. Back when I owned a motorola razr, I had people ask me if my phone was a new nokia model... nokia didn't even make anything remotely similar to the razr. These people have no concept of product names, they refer to tablets as ipads and phones as nokia.
Re:A device with a touchscreen and few buttons was obvious by BitMastro on Monday August 27, 2012 @07:46AM (#4438337)
Well, on the other side I saw lots of ads for the iPad on tv and I don't remember even one about other tablets (I don't know, it may be different in other countries), but because of that, every tablet will an iPad to normal people's eyes