Am I reading it wrong ? I understand both your original comment and this one to paint mono repo as an alternative to micro services. E.g.: “ What is the alternative [to micro services]? Mono-repo?” and “ If you prefer working on mono repo it s fine though I think micro services are more popular one now.” What I understand here is that “mono repo is an alternative to micro services”. Is that what you’re saying?

If so: mono repo is not an alternative to micro services. You can have both. You can have micro services in a mono repo. One single repository with many micro services. That is possible.

What is an alternative to micro services is “monolith”.

Curious how I’m misunderstanding this because I looked at it for a while and I really don’t see it.