News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SpaceX Starship 36 Anomaly by rtkwe on Thursday June 19, 2025 @07:21PM (#44323408)
A smaller purpose build lander that doesn't need the fuel capacity for the entire journey would be significantly shorter and could be wider too. That would get it significantly closer. Enough that a simple ladder would be viable so they aren't reliant on a winch/elevator.
Re:SpaceX Starship 36 Anomaly by Teever on Friday June 20, 2025 @04:50AM (#44325776)
So you're suggesting something similar to the Apollo LEM that will land, and carry enough fuel to return to orbit to dock with something that will contain enough fuel that will return to Earth?

Wouldn't that make the mission unfeasible because it requires ISRU of return fuel?

Re:SpaceX Starship 36 Anomaly by rtkwe on Friday June 20, 2025 @08:51PM (#44333548)
The Starship version of the Mars mission also requires ISRU. At least that's what was presented.

https://newspaceeconomy.ca/2022/05/27/how-will-spacex-make-r...