Re:Brain activity much lower when using AI chatbots, MIT bof...
by fxtentacle on Thursday June 19, 2025 @08:18AM
(#44317947)
... because nobody else uses "boffins" as a positive word anymore.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Brain activity much lower when using AI chatbots, MIT bof...
by OJFord on Thursday June 19, 2025 @08:46AM
(#44318163)
Where are you from? In the UK I'd say it's uncommon but positive. The abbreviation 'boff' is mildly perjorative, but I haven't heard that since school (i.e. 'grade school'), I suppose since at some point around puberty it stops being insulting to say someone's clever.
Re:Brain activity much lower when using AI chatbots, MIT bof...
by tempodox on Thursday June 19, 2025 @09:41AM
(#44318609)
You may have had unsuccessful support for your thesis here:
Re:Brain activity much lower when using AI chatbots, MIT bof...
by SirFatty on Thursday June 19, 2025 @08:46AM
(#44318161)
Because no one else uses "boffins" in tech headline.
e.g. "UK gov asks university boffins to pinpoint cyber growth areas where it should splash cash"
Re:Brain activity much lower when using AI chatbots, MIT bof...
by JdeBP on Thursday June 19, 2025 @08:58AM
(#44318286)
On the contrary, there are uses of "boffins" for "tech" articles in U.K. tabloids such as The Sun, The Daily Star, and The Daily Mirror within the past 3 days alone.
It looks like the request from 2023 fell on deaf ears.