News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A different take on S-expressions by derriz on Wednesday June 18, 2025 @05:00PM (#44313236)
Turned 90, maybe?

  eq:
    mul:
      a
      a 
    pow:
      a
      2
Re:A different take on S-expressions by hyperhello on Wednesday June 18, 2025 @05:10PM (#44313301)
x*x == pow(x,2)
Re:A different take on S-expressions by derriz on Wednesday June 18, 2025 @05:13PM (#44313325)
We have a winner!

Actually, I'd suggest a slight improvement: x*x = x^2

Re:A different take on S-expressions by xigoi on Wednesday June 18, 2025 @06:47PM (#44313942)
x · x = x²
[dead]
Re:A different take on S-expressions by amno on Friday June 20, 2025 @04:23AM (#44325680)
(= * x x ^ x 2)
Re:A different take on S-expressions by unrealhoang on Wednesday June 18, 2025 @09:30PM (#44314666)
no yaml programming please :(
Re:A different take on S-expressions by uncircle on Thursday June 19, 2025 @02:27AM (#44316009)
From the YAML inventor himself: https://yamlscript.org/

The length people go to avoid Lisp, only to reinvent it, badly.

Re:A different take on S-expressions by tgv on Sunday June 22, 2025 @05:52AM (#44345512)
That's the classical LISP way of doing it:

    (eq (mul a
             a)
        (pow a
             2))
or

    (eq
        (mul
             a
             a
        )
        (pow
             a
             2
        )
    )