News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The magic of through running by RLN on Tuesday June 17, 2025 @06:43AM (#44297584)
One problem I've encountered in Munich is they essentially have a single trunk that runs through the centre. In the case of problems on one line you can often find multiple other lines are also affected. London always seems to have a redundancy in the case of a line being unusable.

I suppose this is more a problem of sharing track than through running, but I just found it funny to see Munich public transport described so positively.

Re:The magic of through running by weiliddat on Tuesday June 17, 2025 @07:13AM (#44297746)
> I just found it funny to see Munich public transport described so positively

Been living in Munich for the past 9 years, with the exception of the S-Bahn, it's still very good. I've never felt the need to own a car (only the occasional rental for moving or trips to more remote areas). Anecdotally, I know colleagues and friends who also make do without one, even those with kids.

Only city I've experienced better is Singapore (where I lived for ~7 years), though people complain all the same :D

Re:The magic of through running by bayindirh on Tuesday June 17, 2025 @09:29AM (#44298967)
I once read an anecdote:

In an airport, people complained that luggage delivery was so slow after landings. Airport measured the time, agreed with passengers and increased workforce to reduce waiting times substantially, but the complaints didn't reduce.

Instead, they routed passengers through a longer path, so their luggage was waiting for them when they arrived, and nobody complained about the longer walk.

We, the humans, are interesting.

Re:The magic of through running by devilbunny on Tuesday June 17, 2025 @10:15AM (#44299537)
> nobody complained about the longer walk

I've never formally complained about luggage arrival delays, but I have definitely noticed long walks. Some ridiculously so. I suppose I should complain, but to whom?

Re:The magic of through running by bayindirh on Tuesday June 17, 2025 @10:21AM (#44299600)
Your airline, to bug them to land to a gate closer to luggage hall (which might cost them more), and to the airport operator, to don't make especially convoluted paths to mask other operational delays (if there are).

OTOH, you can't make things easier if the airport is really big. e.g.: Rome, New York, Amsterdam (to an extent) and Istanbul.

Re:The magic of through running by devilbunny on Tuesday June 17, 2025 @11:29AM (#44300363)
I fly mostly out of DFW, which is just a complete shitshow. Atlanta is much better for luggage delivery for international arrivals but you still have long-ass walks to get to the immigration hall.
Re:The magic of through running by bayindirh on Friday June 20, 2025 @05:29AM (#44326000)
I've never been in these two. Thanks for sharing.
Re:The magic of through running by SideburnsOfDoom on Tuesday June 17, 2025 @11:29AM (#44300366)
Context, though. At the end of a flight, i.e. multiple hours where I have to remain seated, a 2-5 minute walk doesn't feel long or a burden.
Re:The magic of through running by bayindirh on Wednesday June 18, 2025 @05:20AM (#44308138)
I also don't think walking is a burden as long as I'm not running to catch a transfer flight.

I prefer to take a later connection flight to prevent these runs, though.

Re:The magic of through running by lupire on Tuesday June 17, 2025 @10:04PM (#44306018)
That's an apocrypha, not an anecdote.
Re:The magic of through running by SideburnsOfDoom on Tuesday June 17, 2025 @07:27AM (#44297826)
> London always seems to have a redundancy in the case of a line being unusable.

The London underground is indeed a redundant spiderweb. But the article focuses more on mainline trains, which are much more constrained.

The only way right through central London for these trains was north-to-south, the Snow Hill tunnel: Kings Cross -> Farringdon -> City Thameslink -> Blackfriars -> South of the river. This can only be a bottleneck.

But now there is the Elizabeth line east-to-west as well.