News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Meta's Llama 3.1 can recall 42 percent of the first Harry... by Aloisius on Monday June 16, 2025 @03:22PM (#44292618)
We know what the world looks like without copyright and that world has far fewer works created and very few artists who can do it full-time absent patronage or independent wealth.

Banning the nonsense that is character copyright and shortening copyright back down to a reasonable length of time (say, 20 years) would still enable the creation of more culturally-relevant derivative works without pauperizing every artist.

Re:Meta's Llama 3.1 can recall 42 percent of the first Harry... by thomastjeffery on Monday June 16, 2025 @04:09PM (#44292963)
How could we possibly know that? Copyright has existed since before the industrial revolution even started. What you described is not really that far from reality today: most artists are not really making a living. The words "starving artist" have not even begun to lose their meaning. Every artist I know has been failed by copyright. The value a copyright creates is not applied to the art: it's applied to the moat around the art. The only certain beneficiaries are the giant corporations that use their collected moats to drown out small competition, including artists.
Re:Meta's Llama 3.1 can recall 42 percent of the first Harry... by Aloisius on Monday June 16, 2025 @05:19PM (#44293497)
The copyright laws that existed prior to the industrial revolution only existed only in a small number of countries. A large swath of the planet had no equivalent.

Even British Colonial America had no copyright, save a handful of exceptions, as the Statute of Anne did not apply to the colonies.