News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Meta's Llama 3.1 can recall 42 percent of the first Harry... by abtinf on Monday June 16, 2025 @12:57AM (#44286723)
Your first point is intentionally obtuse.

Your second point concedes the argument.

Re:Meta's Llama 3.1 can recall 42 percent of the first Harry... by imgabe on Monday June 16, 2025 @01:11AM (#44286777)
No, the second point does not concede the argument. You were talking about the model output infringing the copyright, the second point is talking about the model input infringing the copyright, e.g. if they made unauthorized copies in the process of gathering data to train the model such as by pirating the content. That is unrelated to whether the model output is infringing.

You don't seem to be in a very good position to judge what is and is not obtuse.