News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Seven replies to the viral Apple reasoning paper – and wh... by chongli on Sunday June 15, 2025 @07:35AM (#44281787)
I work in a mail room sending hard copy letters to customers. If I got my job right only 70% of the time then I’d be causing massive privacy breaches daily by sending the wrong personal information to the wrong customers.

Would you trust an AI that gets your banking transactions right only 70% of the time?

Re:Seven replies to the viral Apple reasoning paper – and wh... by amohn9 on Sunday June 15, 2025 @09:53PM (#44286109)
No. I also wouldn’t use a hammer to cut a board in half - I’d grab a saw. Knowing how to pick the right tool is a fundamental part of being a good engineer. Sometimes 70% is unacceptable, sometimes it’s exceptional. LLMs are incredible technology, but also just another tool in the toolbox. Use them where they fit, not where they don’t.
Re:Seven replies to the viral Apple reasoning paper – and wh... by chongli on Monday June 16, 2025 @05:48PM (#44293717)
Sure, though the marketing around LLMs is aimed at general purpose use. It’s up to the user to decide if it’s actually useful for their use case. Unfortunately, many use cases in business can’t tolerate high error rates.