Thank you for sharing. It's a shame that while reading this I get the feeling of prose I associate with fiction. Where there's no reason for that to be the case.

"outside enormous puffed clouds dwelled overhead, lit from beneath by the town of Porto de Galinhas on the Brazilian coast; the smells of burning sugarcane and bitter ocean pushed into my room." is not the kind of sentence one would expect to find in a scientific paper, but I think the paper is improved by it.

The author also has an MFA in poetry

A bit like pg, who also studied fine arts.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Graham_(programmer)

Why is it a shame? Is it a feeling that causes you to suffer?

I view it as a shame that I haven't encountered more instances of prose in this (scientific/technical) context. I think it adds to the 'quality' of the piece. From a selfish point of view I would enjoy if I encountered more of this style of writing while being introduced to topics. Although, I'm also not contributing any writing of any quality to any corpus. So there is dissonance there.

As a complete aside, I thought your writing here http://canonical.org/~kragen/memory-models/ was helpful. And I now know about BNF!

I agree about the style. I often find higher-quality prose in older papers, prior to 01950 and especially prior to 01900.

Thank you very much!