At a time when solar & batteries were just getting great, nah.

Neither is really true, and regardless, that’s 5% of a solution. For big boy energy tasks, we need real solutions.

Haha, I would have thought the reckless cuts of DOGE or willingness of the current US administration to rely on AI for decision making would have driven home exactly why governments can't be trusted to manage nuclear.

It's just too dangerous to leave it in the hands of people who don't believe in science, and value money, power, and ideology more than anything else.

Its happening now, and there is nothing to stop it happening again in future.

Nuclear power plants do not achieve the fission rates required for an explosion, and the system failsafes are designed entirely with an absent crew in mind. Not sure why you think it’s somehow smarter or safer to let them control a hundred gigawatts of solar power but not nuclear power.

Hey look. I found this for you.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/06/trump-fires-comm...

"Further, the NRC rejected past attempts to switch to a model based on the "hormesis theory" that Trump seemingly supports—which posits that some radiation exposure can be beneficial. The NRC found there was "insufficient evidence to justify any changes" that could endanger public health, Science reported.

One health researcher at the University of California, Irvine, Stephen Bondy, told Science that his 2023 review on the science of hormesis showed it is "still unsettled." His characterization of the executive order suggests that the NRC embracing that model "clearly places health hazards as of secondary importance relative to economic and business interests.""