News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Marines mobilized in response to LA protests by bufferoverflow on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @12:43PM (#44249387)
Again, you didn't address what I said. You didn't even denounce their violence, let alone tried to stop these bad actors from your side. Just "peacefully protesting" right next to them. So it's on you. You're a part of the violent riot.

All you have to do for all of this to stop is stop rioting. But we both know you won't.

Re:Marines mobilized in response to LA protests by seanmcdirmid on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @02:00PM (#44250141)
Violence is bad, duh.

> All you have to do for all of this to stop is stop rioting. But we both know you won't.

All you have to do is stop beating your wife, but we both know you won't! Seriously, the loaded question fallacy is as old as Athens itself.

Re:Marines mobilized in response to LA protests by bufferoverflow on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @05:35PM (#44252058)
Again, you can't even utter the words and blame the violent people on your side directly, all you can do is empty platitudes. Pathetic, absolutely pathetic. Get back to your riots.
Re:Marines mobilized in response to LA protests by seanmcdirmid on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @07:13PM (#44252813)
You aren't arguing in good faith, so what's the point? You are using logical fallacies along with a good dose of ad hominem, which has no place on HN, or in intelligent discourse. Yes, the president talks like you also, but no, that still doesn't make it right.
Re:Marines mobilized in response to LA protests by bufferoverflow on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @09:08PM (#44253458)
[flagged]
Re:Marines mobilized in response to LA protests by tomhow on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @10:58PM (#44253910)
Please stop this style of commenting. You've been posting inflammatory comments in this thread for nearly two days. It's not what HN is for and it destroys what HN is for.

You've recently complained in another thread that HN is biased against the ideological position you represent. This is not how we moderate HN. We actively want the HN audience and discussions to represent the full ideological spectrum and for HN to be a uniquely good place for people of different ideological perspectives to discuss difficult topics and learn from each other. But that can't happen when people comment in this inflammatory style.

If you want to parcipate on HN, please do your part to make it a place for healthy discussion between people with different perspectives. Please heed these guidelines in particular:

Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes.

Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive.

When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. "That is idiotic; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be shortened to "1 + 1 is 2, not 3."

Please don't fulminate. Please don't sneer, including at the rest of the community.

Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.

Eschew flamebait. Avoid generic tangents. Omit internet tropes.

Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something.

Please don't use Hacker News for political or ideological battle. It tramples curiosity.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html