Re:Magistral — the first reasoning model by Mistral AI
by redman25 on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @05:06AM
(#44245638)
It may not have been intentionally misleading. Some benchmarks can take a lot of horsepower and time to run. Their preparation for release likely was done well in advance of the model release before the new deepseek r1 model had even been available to test.
Re:Magistral — the first reasoning model by Mistral AI
by reissbaker on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @08:18AM
(#44246826)
AIME24, etc are pretty cheap to run using any DeepSeek API. Regardless, they didn't even run the benchmarks for R1 themselves, they just republished DeepSeek's published numbers from January. They could have published the ones from May, but chose not to.
Re:Magistral — the first reasoning model by Mistral AI
by hmottestad on Friday June 13, 2025 @08:47PM
(#44273446)
Mistral isn’t using misleading benchmarks. I linked to DeepSeek’s own benchmark results that DeepSeek created. I couldn’t find anything newer.
Can you link me to the benchmark you found?
That being said, it's still very impressive for a 24B.
I'm really wondering how the new R1 model isn't beating o3 and 2.5 Pro on every single benchmark.
Sidenote, but I'm pretty sure DeepSeek is focused on V4, and after that will train an R2 on top. The V3-0324 and R1-0528 releases weren't retrained from scratch, they just continued training from the previous V3/R1 checkpoints. They're nice bumps, but V4/R2 will be more significant.
Of course, OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic will have released new models by then too...