News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What the heck does "pythonic" mean? by rbanffy on Thursday August 23, 2012 @09:23AM (#4422175)
BTW, I've been struggling with this: why smart people consider buildout pythonic and pip install -r unpythonic? Can anyone defend that position?

Would that change if I were Dutch?

Re:What the heck does "pythonic" mean? by rbanffy on Thursday August 23, 2012 @12:56PM (#4423438)
Just to be clear, this is a real question. I'd like someone who likes and uses buildout to engage in a constructive discussion about its merits.
Re:What the heck does "pythonic" mean? by slurgfest on Thursday August 23, 2012 @03:03PM (#4424247)
I don't think the Python community in general dictates the use of buildout at all. I reckon there are more supporters for pip install -r (although I would take correction). So the question becomes, why some smart people consider buildout Pythonic. I guess they just like it.
Re:What the heck does "pythonic" mean? by huxley on Thursday August 23, 2012 @04:50PM (#4424770)
Buildout came first and can do more things than pip can. If your workflow was heavily dependent on buildout, I could see how someone would see pip as inadequate. Buildout also came from the Zope community, so that will immediately break people up into camps.

My impression is also that more people use pip now particularly with its integration with virtualenv.

I can't imagine not developing with pip and virtualenv now.