Re:The feature supported in IE6, but not Chrome
by andreasvc on Thursday August 23, 2012 @08:35AM
(#4421992)
It's not a matter of optimization. Compression removes redundancy. A compressed file will have very little redundancy, so compressing it again is largely a waste of CPU cycles. This is supported by mathematical principles (cf. information theory).
Re:The feature supported in IE6, but not Chrome
by colanderman on Thursday August 23, 2012 @09:38AM
(#4422250)
> Compressing an already-compressed file can make it bigger due to metainfo
That's not why, that's just a reason why doing so is silly.
> the gzip algorithm isn't optimised as well for images as say, jpeg.
gzip is used in PNG.
Read the article; the reason is because he wasn't sending gzip data, just deflate data.
I guess the browsers figure it's not worth building in support for a feature that's rarely used and creates a sub-optimal UX.