News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Trump deploys 2k National Guard members after Los Angeles... by userlander on Sunday June 08, 2025 @09:14AM (#44216817)
Hegseth also threatened to deploy active Marines because he's a small little boy that needs validation from his orange keeper. What a dark f*#$@ng time this is. "But Biden was old"... I'd rather have a half dead octogenarian that can make rational decisions than a narcissist with no bounds that is also losing his mental faculties - no brainer to me. This country is doomed if we don't change the situation and fast.
[dead]
Re:Trump deploys 2k National Guard members after Los Angeles... by userlander on Sunday June 08, 2025 @09:29AM (#44216885)
I don't have a responsibility to campaign for secession, that's nonsense. I have a responsibility to campaign for justice and what I believe is right. I believe that targeting immigrants and calling them criminals and rapists is wrong and that sending Marines to put down a protest that is well within the means of the LAPD is fascist.

And what in the world do you mean by "forcing other people to socialize with them"? They're humans. We can't be bothered to socialize with people that maybe look different than us? Sad world. Actually, sorry, sad country this is.

Re:Trump deploys 2k National Guard members after Los Angeles... by msgodel on Sunday June 08, 2025 @09:31AM (#44216899)
Again, if you really care to solve the problems you claim you want to solve you should pay attention to the logos, not the rhetoric, of what I wrote.
Re:Trump deploys 2k National Guard members after Los Angeles... by tomrod on Sunday June 08, 2025 @09:40AM (#44216944)
Third party to your conversation, but I have no idea why you wrote what you wrote. Your argument was fully rhetoric, so I don't imagine you're meaningfully saying to ignore you?
Re:Trump deploys 2k National Guard members after Los Angeles... by userlander on Sunday June 08, 2025 @09:48AM (#44216980)
By that logic, if you believe any policy is wrong, you should immediately advocate for secession rather than trying to change it. That seems weak to me. But go on, do you.