Re:The time bomb in the tax code that's fueling mass tech la...
by wdaher on Friday June 06, 2025 @03:59PM
(#44204435)
This is what the Sec 174 change said: it says that you do have to capitalize it.
Re:The time bomb in the tax code that's fueling mass tech la...
by mppm on Friday June 06, 2025 @04:01PM
(#44204452)
Elsewhere in the world (under IFRS accounting rules) capitalization of R&D costs has been a firm requirement for a while. The US has been somewhat unique in allowing them to be expensed instead, until recently.
Re:The time bomb in the tax code that's fueling mass tech la...
by svara on Friday June 06, 2025 @04:22PM
(#44204612)
Taxes are calculated according to tax accounting rules, not IFRS, though?
I know of at least two Western European countries where you don't have to do that. Don't worry, we pay enough taxes either way ;)
Re:The time bomb in the tax code that's fueling mass tech la...
by mppm on Friday June 06, 2025 @04:33PM
(#44204702)
Yeah, seems I was wrong about that. Apparently most IFRS countries allow expensing R&D for tax purposes, regardless of accounting. Many even have an R&D superdeduction nowadays.
Sorry for the noise :(
Re:The time bomb in the tax code that's fueling mass tech la...
by bravesoul2 on Friday June 06, 2025 @06:37PM
(#44205728)
I was confused and has to double check. In Australia you can deduct them https://www.ato.gov.au/businesses-and-organisations/income-d...
Re:The time bomb in the tax code that's fueling mass tech la...
by 0xWTF on Friday June 06, 2025 @06:46PM
(#44205799)
Came here to ask about the Aussie RDTI. So, if I spend $10M on R&D and make $5M, what's the difference between US and Aussie net?
Re:The time bomb in the tax code that's fueling mass tech la...
by anticensor on Saturday June 07, 2025 @11:31AM
(#44210314)
Some countries have uniform accounting where the tax accounting rules closely follow IFRS.
Otherwise I'm quite amazed that salaries can be carried forward as future expenses.