News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Whitehouse.gov Has A New Face.

Re:Whitehouse.gov Has A New Face by bgutierrez on Tuesday January 20, 2009 @01:36PM (#442034)
Even better, it's valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whitehous...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Whitehouse.gov Has A New Face by axod on Tuesday January 20, 2009 @02:12PM (#442098)
//<![CDATA[ Why is this good? &amp; why is it better than HTML4.01 Strict? XHTML is not beautiful. //]]>
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Whitehouse.gov Has A New Face by teej on Tuesday January 20, 2009 @02:53PM (#442158)
XHTML is also pointless when it's served up at text/html
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Whitehouse.gov Has A New Face by evdawg on Wednesday January 21, 2009 @03:37AM (#442980)
Who cares if it validates? The underlying markup is pretty unsemantic.

Just because it validates doesn't mean it's a well-coded website.

[ Parent | on HN ]