Re:Gemini-2.5-pro-preview-06-05
by zamadatix on Thursday June 05, 2025 @02:58PM
(#44194702)
I think the only way to be particularly impressed with new leading models lately is to hold the opinion all of the benchmarks are inaccurate and/or irrelevant and it's vibes/anecdotes where the model is really light years ahead. Otherwise you look at the numbers on e.g. lmarena and see it's claiming a ~16% preference win rate for gpt-3.5-turbo from November of 2023 over this new world-leading model from Google.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Not sure I follow - Gemini has ELO 1470, GPT3.5-turbo is 1206, which is an 86% win rate. https://chatgpt.com/share/6841f69d-b2ec-800c-9f8c-3e802ebbc0...
gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 from November 2023 was 1170, 1206 is for the March variant.
Change that and you get ~84%, flip the order (i.e. the win rate of GPT-3.5 is ~16%). I.e. the point is a two year old model still wins far too often to be excited about each new top model for the last two years, not that the two year old model is better.
Re:Gemini-2.5-pro-preview-06-05
by Workaccount2 on Thursday June 05, 2025 @04:36PM
(#44195544)
People can ask whatever they want on LMarena, so a question like "List some good snacks to bring to work" might elicit a win for a old/tiny/deprecated model simply because it lists the snack the user liked more.