News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ship Carrying EVs Abandoned in Pacific After Catching Fire by lupusreal on Wednesday June 04, 2025 @03:31PM (#44184604)
There's a qualitative difference between a car that's likely to burn on the road when being driven, and one that's likely to burn in the middle of the night when parked in a garage attached to my house.
Re:Ship Carrying EVs Abandoned in Pacific After Catching Fire by mrguyorama on Wednesday June 04, 2025 @04:14PM (#44184996)
>one that's likely to burn in the middle of the night when parked in a garage attached to my house.

ICE cars do this all the time. It doesn't make the news as much as a brand new product doing that.

Granted, the "EVs are less likely to start fires" take is also misleading. It's not usually doing a "like for like" comparison, because the majority of ICE fires are in very old and poorly maintained cars. Things like wires chewed through by rats, oil leaking out of gaskets and accumulating, stupid wiring for speakers, etc.

It will depend how gracefully the average EV ages when owned by the average person who ignores maintenance.

Keep in mind we've had old lithium ion batteries for two decades now, and we don't see your average phone store randomly burning down. Or those kiosks you can sell absolutely clapped out, old phones to. How often do those burn down?

Re:Ship Carrying EVs Abandoned in Pacific After Catching Fire by lupusreal on Thursday June 05, 2025 @05:29PM (#44195978)
Phones and laptops burn often enough that I am careful to never leave one unattended on a couch or bed.