Re:Cloud Run GPUs, now GA, makes running AI workloads easier...
by icedchai on Wednesday June 04, 2025 @09:37AM
(#44180615)
Cloud Run is a great service. I find it much easier to work with than AWS's equivalent (ECS/Fargate.)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Cloud Run GPUs, now GA, makes running AI workloads easier...
by psanford on Wednesday June 04, 2025 @11:27AM
(#44181782)
AWS AppRunner is the closest equivalent to Cloud Run. Its really not close though, AppRunner is an unloved service at AWS and is missing a lot of the features that make Cloud Run nice.
Re:Cloud Run GPUs, now GA, makes running AI workloads easier...
by vrosas on Wednesday June 04, 2025 @12:22PM
(#44182435)
AppRunner was Amazon's answer to AppEngine a full decade+ later. Cloud Run is miles ahead.
Re:Cloud Run GPUs, now GA, makes running AI workloads easier...
by romanhn on Wednesday June 04, 2025 @01:58PM
(#44183607)
I agree with the unloved part. It was a great middle ground between Lambda and Fargate (zero cold start, reasonable pricing), but has seemingly been in maintenance mode for quite a while now. Really sad to see.
Re:Cloud Run GPUs, now GA, makes running AI workloads easier...
by gabe_monroy on Wednesday June 04, 2025 @11:14AM
(#44181597)
i am biased, but i agree :)
Re:Cloud Run GPUs, now GA, makes running AI workloads easier...
by icedchai on Wednesday June 04, 2025 @11:32AM
(#44181858)
hah. I looked at your comments and saw you were a google VP! I've migrated some small systems from AWS to GCP for various POCs and prototypes, mostly Lambda and ECS to Cloud Run, and find GCP provides a better developer experience overall.
Re:Cloud Run GPUs, now GA, makes running AI workloads easier...
by gabe_monroy on Wednesday June 04, 2025 @12:03PM
(#44182234)
love that you're enjoying the devex. we put a lot of sweat into it, especially in services like cloud run.
Re:Cloud Run GPUs, now GA, makes running AI workloads easier...
by ashishb on Wednesday June 04, 2025 @02:53PM
(#44184174)
Yeah, anyone who uses GCP and AWS thoroughly will agree that GCP is a superior developer experience.
The problem is continuous product churn. This was discussed at length at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41614795
Re:Cloud Run GPUs, now GA, makes running AI workloads easier...
by AChampaign on Wednesday June 04, 2025 @09:39AM
(#44180625)
I think Lambda is more or less the AWS equivalent.
Re:Cloud Run GPUs, now GA, makes running AI workloads easier...
by icedchai on Wednesday June 04, 2025 @11:22AM
(#44181724)
It's not. Cloud Run can be longer running: you can have batch and services. Lambda is closer to Cloud Functions.
Re:Cloud Run GPUs, now GA, makes running AI workloads easier...
by ZeroCool2u on Wednesday June 04, 2025 @10:00AM
(#44180835)
I think Cloud Run Functions would be the direct equivalent to Lambda.
Re:Cloud Run GPUs, now GA, makes running AI workloads easier...
by hn_throwaway_99 on Wednesday June 04, 2025 @10:21AM
(#44181025)
I agree, but in the GCP world, a lot of these things are merging. My understanding is that Cloud Run, Cloud Run Functions (previously known as Cloud Functions Gen2) and even App Engine Flexible all run in the same underlying cloud run infrastructure, so it's essentially just some interface differences that to me now seem more like historical legacy/backwards compatibility reasons than meaningful functionality differences (e.g. Functions can now handle multiple concurrent requests).
Re:Cloud Run GPUs, now GA, makes running AI workloads easier...
by yegle on Wednesday June 04, 2025 @10:32AM
(#44181112)
FWIW, App Engine Flexible is a different product that runs on GCE VM.
Other products (App Engine standard, Cloud Functions gen1, Cloud Run, Cloud Run Functions) share many underlying infrastructures.
Re:Cloud Run GPUs, now GA, makes running AI workloads easier...
by hn_throwaway_99 on Wednesday June 04, 2025 @01:20PM
(#44183119)
Oh, thanks! I guess I had it backwards - I thought App Engine standard was the one on a different infrastructure.
Re:Cloud Run GPUs, now GA, makes running AI workloads easier...
by AChampaign on Wednesday June 04, 2025 @10:16AM
(#44180971)
Oh, you’re probably right.