Re:Ask HN: Has anybody built search on top of Anna's Archive?
by bawolff on Wednesday June 04, 2025 @04:06AM
(#44178321)
98% sounds good enough for the usecase suggested here.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ask HN: Has anybody built search on top of Anna's Archive?
by pastage on Wednesday June 04, 2025 @06:59AM
(#44179369)
Writing good validators for data is hard. You can be 100% sure that there will be bad data in those 98%. From my own experience I thought I had 50% of the books converted correctly and then I found I still had junk data and gave up, it is not an impossible problem I just was not motivated to fix it on my own. Working with your own copies is fine, but when you try to share that you get into legal issues that I just do not feel are that interesting to solve.
Edit: my point is that I would like to share my work but that is hard to do in a legal way. That is the main reason I gave up.
Re:Ask HN: Has anybody built search on top of Anna's Archive?
by landl0rd on Wednesday June 04, 2025 @09:25AM
(#44180494)
2% garbage, if some of that garbage falls out the right way, is more than enough to seriously degrade search result quality.
Re:Ask HN: Has anybody built search on top of Anna's Archive?
by carlosjobim on Wednesday June 04, 2025 @09:44AM
(#44180672)
It's better than nothing, and nothing is what we currently have.