Re:The Comparative Productivity of Programming Languages | D...
by softbuilder on Tuesday August 21, 2012 @11:06PM
(#4415857)
For those who read the comments before the content, ABORT ABORT! It's not even worth your time to read about why it's not worth your time.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Comparative Productivity of Programming Languages | D...
by mattparlane on Tuesday August 21, 2012 @11:24PM
(#4415895)
Agreed.
Also -- ASP is not a language, unless they're talking about VBScript, which I would have thought would be lumped with VB.
Re:The Comparative Productivity of Programming Languages | D...
by softbuilder on Wednesday August 22, 2012 @12:56AM
(#4416118)
That didn't bother me. I think there's a legit argument to be made for classic ASP as its own language. The lack of distinction between .NET and pre-.NET languages was the irksome bit for me. Edit: But far from the only irksome bit, hence my warning to others. :)