News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Investment Risk Is Highest for Nuclear Power Plants, Lowe... by Calwestjobs on Saturday May 31, 2025 @08:13AM (#44143728)
flywheel nonsense, just add battery.
Re:Investment Risk Is Highest for Nuclear Power Plants, Lowe... by JumpCrisscross on Saturday May 31, 2025 @08:16AM (#44143748)
> flywheel nonsense, just add battery

Flywheels are batteries. If your model is predicated on a particular chemistry of battery, it’s overfitted.

Re:Investment Risk Is Highest for Nuclear Power Plants, Lowe... by mousethatroared on Saturday May 31, 2025 @11:42AM (#44144988)
Which requires inverters, which are a huge problem.

Riddle me this, what instantaneous voltage should an inverter target if the grid's at a fault condition? Stated another way, how do you define the frequency of a non-sinuoid?

Careful, get the wrong answer and you get a short and you help melt millions of dollars of equipment, some with year old lead times.

Re:Investment Risk Is Highest for Nuclear Power Plants, Lowe... by Calwestjobs on Saturday May 31, 2025 @01:17PM (#44145675)
it is no riddle. you are asking questions from 1942. except you put inverter into it. so you either think about current technology or go spark some wires.

you can island and not island at same time. decentralized grid means DECENTRALIZED grid.

every renewable needs battery next to it.

Re:Investment Risk Is Highest for Nuclear Power Plants, Lowe... by mousethatroared on Saturday May 31, 2025 @01:32PM (#44145772)
Indeed, not a problem to solve if you have all day to measure it.

The trick is measuring a frequency in the 60s of Hz of a non-sinusoid within a thousandth of a second.

Otherwise you get a short.