News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Human coders are still better than LLMs by gitaarik on Friday May 30, 2025 @12:01PM (#44137539)
Sorry but I don't follow your logic. Are you claiming that reward models that aren't curated by humans perform as well as ones that are?

Then what is a reward model's function according to you?

Re:Human coders are still better than LLMs by JoshCole on Friday May 30, 2025 @01:14PM (#44138195)
In reinforcement learning and related fields, a _reward model_ is a function that assigns a scalar value (a reward) to a given state, representing how desirable it is. You're at liberty to have compound states: for an example, a trajectory (often called tau) or a state action pair (typically represented by s and a).
Re:Human coders are still better than LLMs by vidarh on Saturday May 31, 2025 @05:06AM (#44142992)
I'm claiming exactly what I wrote: That there is no inherent reason why a human curated one needs to be better.