Re:Human coders are still better than LLMs
by roywiggins on Thursday May 29, 2025 @10:14PM
(#44132160)
Depends on how good they get at realizing they need more context and tool use to look it up for you.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Human coders are still better than LLMs
by prisenco on Thursday May 29, 2025 @11:11PM
(#44132474)
How would they reliably recognize the context needed without the necessary context?
Re:Human coders are still better than LLMs
by roywiggins on Friday May 30, 2025 @02:26PM
(#44138766)
in the case of hallucinating a library, give it access to an IDE's autocomplete or type checker or whatever so it can check if the functions it thinks exist actually do, if they don't, start feeding it documentation or type info about the library until it spits out stuff that type checks
For other stuff this is obviously harder.