News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Blowtorch Theory: A new model for structure formation... by JSchneider321 on Wednesday May 28, 2025 @03:12PM (#44119604)
You're clearly either misrepresenting the author intentionally or out of good old fashioned ignorance. Gough is very well-educated and the ideas are carefully considered and are just an extension of Dr. Lee Smolin's CNS theory, which is itself based on sound science.

If you didn't finish reading the article, I really recommend you go back and give it another go. If you don't get caught up in trying to explain the mechanisms (which may be limited given our current limited understanding, ESPECIALLY of quantum gravity), I think you'll have to see that there's something there.

I mean for fuck's sake, y'all sound like religious zealots arguing against evolution.

Re:The Blowtorch Theory: A new model for structure formation... by colechristensen on Thursday May 29, 2025 @12:07AM (#44123036)
@dang there are several brand new accounts created today which have only commented on this post which I find rather suspicious
Re:The Blowtorch Theory: A new model for structure formation... by JSchneider321 on Thursday May 29, 2025 @12:11PM (#44127444)
I'd never heard of the site before yesterday. Doesn't some day need to be the first day everyone starts posting? And can't a theory someone read about months ago and finds compelling be reason enough to seek out others to engage with on the subject?

Are you suggesting I'm a bot or an alt from the author or something? Because that feels like an illogical leap to make based on someone posting enthusiastically about a subject. I do wonder if you'd suspect these accounts equally if the viewpoint expressed aligned with yours.