Re:Improving performance of original dav1d video decoder
by viraptor on Tuesday May 27, 2025 @12:06AM
(#44103879)
> funding taken away from the original project towards another effort
Alternative phrasing: "funding originally applied to one project benefiting multiple efforts". It's sad to see people from open source doing... gatekeeping? jealousy? something...
Re:Improving performance of original dav1d video decoder
by blub on Tuesday May 27, 2025 @01:25AM
(#44104145)
Alternative definition of outsourcing: the salary originally applied to one person in high cost country benefiting multiple people in low cost country :)
But… why high cost country developers jealous?
Re:Improving performance of original dav1d video decoder
by hitekker on Wednesday May 28, 2025 @06:40PM
(#44121269)
> rav1d proclaims that Rust is (almost) as fast as C when all the performance engineering efforts went in the ASM bits, that were copied verbatim from dav1d.
This is key. Not to mention how advocates for ra1vd are gaming their benchmarks and obscuring how unsafe the actual code is. The bounty presenting it as "safe" on memorysafety.org is a laugh.
IMO, that dishonesty deserves some snark from VLC and ffmpeg.
My best guess would be for the same reasons the ffmpeg twitter account has shown a lot of vitriol too: funding taken away from the original project towards another effort.