Re:Claude 4
by dr_dshiv on Friday May 23, 2025 @03:25AM
(#44070685)
Especially since the EU just made open source contributors liable for cybersecurity (Cyber Resilience Act). Just let AI contribute and ur good
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Didn’t they make an exception for open-source projects? https://opensource.org/blog/the-european-regulators-listened...
Yeah, just the usual hn FUD about the EU.
Re:Claude 4
by throwaway894345 on Friday May 23, 2025 @12:22PM
(#44074195)
Can you reconcile that with this sibling comment?
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44074070
I don’t have an opinion, just trying to make sense of contradictory claims.
“Anyone opensourcing anything while in the course of ‘commercial activity’ will be fully liable. Effectively they rugpulled the Apache2 / MIT licenses... all opensource released by small businesses is fucked. where the was no red tape now there is infinite liability”
This is my current understanding, from a friend not a lawyer. Would appreciate any insight from folks here.
Re:Claude 4
by spiderfarmer on Friday May 23, 2025 @05:53PM
(#44076962)
So you’re willfully spreading FUD in hopes someone will enlighten you?
The law is real. What emotions would you suggest are appropriate?
Re:Claude 4
by spiderfarmer on Saturday May 24, 2025 @12:41AM
(#44078829)
Open Source is exempt, provided you don’t make a profit:
https://kevinboone.me/open_source_liability.html
So it applies to anyone who figures out how to monetize open-source contributions. Seems like a major issue to me. Not exactly something that makes Europe a good place for tech.
Re:Claude 4
by spiderfarmer on Monday May 26, 2025 @01:07AM
(#44094138)
The US has the reputation that rich competitors will abuse the judicial system to sue you into bankruptcy. Still, a lot of people want to start their tech startup there.