News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Clojure: 1, Common Lisp: 0 by icey on Monday January 19, 2009 @11:02AM (#440558)
I'm going to have to disagree with you here. You rarely hear about people having issues getting the JVM set up on a random machine. On the other hand, deployment of SBCL is a complaint you hear somewhat regularly from people using shared hosting.

It's not necessarily a fault of SBCL, as much as it is a function of Java's popularity. But to say they equally share deployment problems seems a bit misguided to me.

Re:Clojure: 1, Common Lisp: 0 by mcxx on Monday January 19, 2009 @11:44AM (#440608)
Yeah, you are probably right. Because of Java's popularity and high demand, hosting providers have to be Java-ready and nowadays, it's not a problem.

However, it seems I've been living in a cave. Besides the Reddit case, I haven't heard (or at least can't remember) about problems running a CL environment. Can people who had this problem please reply - what disto, what implementation, what was the issue?

Re:Clojure: 1, Common Lisp: 0 by jimbokun on Monday January 19, 2009 @12:18PM (#440653)
My experience trying to move some code from SBCL/OS X to a particular version of Linux is partially documented here.

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/msg/0450136edf...

The use case was a final class project, where the instructor needed to be able to run the final version of the program just by executing a script in an unpacked tar file. Couldn't get SBCL to run with the limited time I spent on it. Got CMUCL to run, but not in a way that could be deployed in a self installing manner. Punted and used Java (was easier to work with team members that way, too).

Clojure would have been perfect.

Re:Clojure: 1, Common Lisp: 0 by narag on Tuesday January 20, 2009 @11:06AM (#441851)
I've had a lot of issues with JVM in a cheap hosting with Virtuozzo (a VPS). I assume people that are using Java choose a provider that gives it preinstalled.