Re:AI's energy footprint
by nightski on Wednesday May 21, 2025 @10:45AM
(#44052040)
How does it make you feel that your computing carbon footprint may be higher than rolling coal? Are we the problem?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
How did you get those numbers? Based on the article and my searching around
Llama 3.1: ~0.7 to 1.5 grams of CO2
Rolling coal event: ~10,000 to 100,000+ grams of CO2
You think rolling coal releases 10 - 100 kg (20 - 200 lb) of CO2 into the atmosphere?
You would need hundreds of lb of gasoline for that!
Re:AI's energy footprint
by fisherjeff on Wednesday May 21, 2025 @12:58PM
(#44053486)
That'd actually only be about 1-10 gallons, or about 6-60 pounds. Regardless, I'd guess it's probably only <500g CO2.
Re:AI's energy footprint
by FollowingTheDao on Wednesday May 21, 2025 @10:50AM
(#44052089)
> Are we the problem?
Yes.
Re:AI's energy footprint
by olddustytrail on Wednesday May 21, 2025 @02:03PM
(#44054312)
Who is "we"? I had to look up this moronic activity because I'm not American.
I refuse to believe that anyone with a functioning brain would choose to engage in it. Are you saying you do?