Re:The Fractured Entangled Representation Hypothesis
by ipunchghosts on Tuesday May 20, 2025 @02:40PM
(#44044548)
Is what your saying imply that there is a rotation matrix you can apply to each activation output to make it less entangled?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Fractured Entangled Representation Hypothesis
by goldemerald on Tuesday May 20, 2025 @02:47PM
(#44044609)
Not quite. For an underlying semantic concept (e.g., smiling face), you can go from a basis vector [0,1,0,...,0] to the original latent space via a single rotation. You could then induce said concept by manipulating the original latent point by traversing along that linear direction.
Re:The Fractured Entangled Representation Hypothesis
by ipunchghosts on Tuesday May 20, 2025 @02:52PM
(#44044657)
I think we are saying the same thing. Please correct me though where I am wrong. You could look at the maps in some way but instead of the basis being one hot dimensions (the standard basis), it could be rotated.
Re:The Fractured Entangled Representation Hypothesis
by akarshkumar0101 on Tuesday May 20, 2025 @02:57PM
(#44044703)
We mention this issue exactly in the fourth paragraph in Section 4 and in Appendix F!