News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Solar grants held hostage in Pennsylvania legislature – a... by vondur on Sunday May 18, 2025 @12:34PM (#44022539)
It looks like big parts of Pennsylvania only average about 3.5 hours of sunlight per day over the year. Maybe not the best investment?
Re:Solar grants held hostage in Pennsylvania legislature – a... by Jtsummers on Sunday May 18, 2025 @12:43PM (#44022587)
Source for that claim?
Re:Solar grants held hostage in Pennsylvania legislature – a... by vondur on Sunday May 18, 2025 @01:25PM (#44022900)
Re:Solar grants held hostage in Pennsylvania legislature – a... by Jtsummers on Sunday May 18, 2025 @01:28PM (#44022931)
You've misrepresented what that page says. It talks about "Average hours of full-sun per day" which is very different than your claim:

> It looks like big parts of Pennsylvania only average about 3.5 hours of sunlight per day over the year.

3.5 hours of sunlight per day != 3.5 average hours of full-sun per day.

Additionally, if you re-read your page, the number is higher than your claim of 3.5, it's 3 hours and 50+ minutes for all PA locations listed. So you misrepresented what the page describes and you misstated the numbers. What's the point of your original comment?

Re:Solar grants held hostage in Pennsylvania legislature – a... by pfdietz on Sunday May 18, 2025 @12:57PM (#44022687)
The maps I see show somewhere just below 4 kWh/m^2/day for much of Pennsylvania.

https://www.altestore.com/pages/solar-maps-for-the-usa

The desert southwest is only at most around 6 kWh/m^2/day, mind you.

This is horizontal irradiation; a PV module tilted properly would receive more effective hours per day. Also, half the solar intensity for twice as long would enable inverters to be downsized, even if the average kWh/m^2/day were unchanged.