Re:A $130M company faked trials instead of running our free OSS
by rideontime on Friday May 16, 2025 @08:43AM
(#44004771)
Comparing it to the LLM's previous post on your blog, it's a little better - that one's got far more of the superfluous analogies and interrupting em-dashes. I honestly think you'd be better off posting your own writing put through DeepL than letting the LLM churn it into mediocrity.
Re:A $130M company faked trials instead of running our free OSS
by funki on Friday May 16, 2025 @08:44AM
(#44004784)
Kudos for owning it so earnestly
Re:A $130M company faked trials instead of running our free OSS
by rounce on Friday May 16, 2025 @08:58AM
(#44004922)
*English speaker
Re:A $130M company faked trials instead of running our free OSS
by jeffbee on Friday May 16, 2025 @09:22AM
(#44005190)
LLMs don't have good "flow" either. Their signature style is full of clichés. Personally, I would prefer to read the quirky non-idiomatic structures of a foreign language speaker than something fixed by an LLM.
Anyway, I'm doing my best to keep my own "signature" in writing, but it's really hard when you see a better phrasing generated on your original more limited vocabulary. But anyway, I'll do better next time, thanks for the feedback!