News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A $130M company faked trials instead of running our free OSS by plam503711 on Friday May 16, 2025 @08:33AM (#44004662)
I first write my entire text and then after that I use a LLM to fix the grammar and have a better flow. I'm doing my best but I'm not a native US speaker. Before LLMs, people complained about the weird sentences or mistakes I made. Pick your poison ;)

Anyway, I'm doing my best to keep my own "signature" in writing, but it's really hard when you see a better phrasing generated on your original more limited vocabulary. But anyway, I'll do better next time, thanks for the feedback!

Re:A $130M company faked trials instead of running our free OSS by rideontime on Friday May 16, 2025 @08:43AM (#44004771)
Comparing it to the LLM's previous post on your blog, it's a little better - that one's got far more of the superfluous analogies and interrupting em-dashes. I honestly think you'd be better off posting your own writing put through DeepL than letting the LLM churn it into mediocrity.
Re:A $130M company faked trials instead of running our free OSS by funki on Friday May 16, 2025 @08:44AM (#44004784)
Kudos for owning it so earnestly
Re:A $130M company faked trials instead of running our free OSS by rounce on Friday May 16, 2025 @08:58AM (#44004922)
*English speaker
Re:A $130M company faked trials instead of running our free OSS by jeffbee on Friday May 16, 2025 @09:22AM (#44005190)
LLMs don't have good "flow" either. Their signature style is full of clichés. Personally, I would prefer to read the quirky non-idiomatic structures of a foreign language speaker than something fixed by an LLM.
Re:A $130M company faked trials instead of running our free OSS by vsl on Saturday May 17, 2025 @02:53AM (#44012511)
Give DeepL Writer a try.