Re:A $130M company faked trials instead of running our free OSS
by reconnecting on Friday May 16, 2025 @08:43AM
(#44004776)
I take my words back!
I saw that your company is in Grenoble. Just drop me an email, and I will personally come to your office and help set up tirreno to resolve this trial abuse.
Re:A $130M company faked trials instead of running our free OSS
by plam503711 on Friday May 16, 2025 @09:04AM
(#44004995)
I'm open to discuss, please add me on LinkedIn :) (you can find it in the author icon at the end of the blog post)
Re:A $130M company faked trials instead of running our free OSS
by reconnecting on Friday May 16, 2025 @09:31AM
(#44005318)
I had sent an email. (-;
Re:A $130M company faked trials instead of running our free OSS
by arp242 on Friday May 16, 2025 @08:39AM
(#44004722)
> freshly registered email accounts can be blocked almost in real time.
How does it detect if an email account is freshly registered?
Re:A $130M company faked trials instead of running our free OSS
by reconnecting on Friday May 16, 2025 @08:46AM
(#44004809)
We provide an API to check IP and email reputation.
Re:A $130M company faked trials instead of running our free OSS
by DocTomoe on Friday May 16, 2025 @08:44AM
(#44004789)
chances are: checks it against a database of addresses it has seen before (e.g. because they were used to register stuff elsewhere). No such entry, or entries all younger than n days -> 'freshly registered'.
Sucks for people who don't use their addresses for just about anything.
Re:A $130M company faked trials instead of running our free OSS
by reconnecting on Friday May 16, 2025 @09:09AM
(#44005060)
It is not a healthy idea to prevent access to a trial solely because of a lack of reputation associated with an email. However, in this specific case, if there is a rotation of numbers at the end of the email, tirreno has rules that detect similar email patterns.
Additionally, I assume that registrations are coming from the same IP or network, which should make it simple to detect through platform.
Re:A $130M company faked trials instead of running our free OSS
by bradleyankrom on Friday May 16, 2025 @08:29AM
(#44004615)
^ creator of Tirreno
Re:A $130M company faked trials instead of running our free OSS
by reconnecting on Friday May 16, 2025 @08:31AM
(#44004643)
Thank you. I'm still not sure if this should be mentioned. On the one hand, I don't want to overly promote the tirreno, but on the other hand, when I see an issue such as trial abuse that could be easily resolved, I can't resist. My bad.
Re:A $130M company faked trials instead of running our free OSS
by masklinn on Friday May 16, 2025 @09:08AM
(#44005041)
If you mention the product, even if it’s an absolutely perfect fit, you should definitely disclose the conflict of interest upfront.
This is not about overly promoting the product, it’s about making clear that you are promoting your product (or project, doesn’t even have to be a product).
Re:A $130M company faked trials instead of running our free OSS
by reconnecting on Friday May 16, 2025 @09:11AM
(#44005086)
Noted with thanks. Will do.
[0] https://github.com/TirrenoTechnologies/tirreno
(creator of tirreno)