Re:Basics of Memory Addresses in C
by dschatz on Friday August 17, 2012 @08:57PM
(#4399715)
Nice introduction. I think it is worth pointing out that much of what you discuss is implementation dependent, the c standard doesn't require an implementation to lay out data in memory in any particular way. Instead it requires that access semantics behave in a particular way. These semantics, in turn, align with easy, low level implementations.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Basics of Memory Addresses in C
by justincormack on Saturday August 18, 2012 @04:17AM
(#4400573)
Er yes, virtual memory is an allowed implementation!