Re:A Proposal To Improve Hacker News
by MartinCron on Friday August 17, 2012 @08:00PM
(#4399528)
The other thing is that his proposal was a proposal to "improve" Hacker News, not a promise to "fix" hacker news. Trying to do a grand massive "fix every problem" is more likely to introduce new problems than just making relatively safe improvements.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A Proposal To Improve Hacker News
by thaumaturgy on Friday August 17, 2012 @08:12PM
(#4399576)
This is essentially the old argument over whether it's better to patch old bad code, or whether it's better to rewrite old bad code. I think all of the same responses would apply, i.e., whether or not new problems might be preferable to the existing ones. Since much smarter people than I have written carefully-considered essays on that argument (and without coming to a clear conclusion), I'll just let them speak for me. :-)
Re:A Proposal To Improve Hacker News
by MartinCron on Friday August 17, 2012 @11:00PM
(#4400054)
It is OK to have an in-context opinion, though. My opinion on this is to change as little as possible, and one thing at a time.
Let us not forget the object lesson from Digg's big redesign.