Re:AlphaEvolve: A Gemini-powered coding agent for designing ...
by proof_by_vibes on Wednesday May 14, 2025 @12:55PM
(#43986734)
Testing in general is quickly being outmoded by formal verification. From my own gut, I see software engineering pivoting into consulting—wherein the deliverables are something akin to domain-specific languages that are tailored to a client's business needs.
Re:AlphaEvolve: A Gemini-powered coding agent for designing ...
by static_void on Wednesday May 14, 2025 @01:58PM
(#43987421)
Indeed, reasoning in the small and reasoning in the large are different skills. Architecture abstracts over code.
Re:AlphaEvolve: A Gemini-powered coding agent for designing ...
by ldjkfkdsjnv on Wednesday May 14, 2025 @02:31PM
(#43987731)
Generally the product decisions are not given to the engineers. But yeah, engineers will be tuning, prodding, and poking ai systems to generate the code to match the business requirements.
Some of these questions change slightly, since we might end up with "unlimited resources" (i.e. instead of having e.g. 5 engineers on a team who can only get X done per sprint, we effectively have near-limitless compute to use instead) so maybe the answer is "build everything on the wish-list in 1 day" to the "what should we prioritize" type questions?
Interesting times.
My gut is that software engineers will end up as glorified test engineers, coming up with test cases (even if not actually writing the code) and asking the AI to write code until it passes.