> I don't think your framing nor your conclusion is correct. Copyright law wasn't written to make Party A or B wealthy, it was written to protect the incentive to produce things that society values.

That's not really different from what I said. "What society values" is what people spend money on, and that money is used to influence policy.

> Or courts will have to decide we know longer value music, art, literature, etc. made by humans -- seems like a long shot to me.

The courts only interpret the law and it's pretty clear to me the law is going to change.